Does the Federal Election affect interest rates?

Jul 21
Posted by Plan Assist Filed in Latest News

Interest RatesIf you find yourself asking this question, it’s time to learn the answer.

The lizard brain (quick) answer is: No. Stop listening to the fear tactics of politicians, and start thinking for yourself.

The brain surgeon (long) answer is: Interest rates are set independently by the RBA Board each month in response to economic conditions such as inflation, unemployment rate, global trade, property markets, currency fluctuations, and a crystal ball.

There is a small influence from the government in the fiscal and monetary policy such as stimulus into the economy. i.e. baby bonuses, pensioner handouts, first home owner grants. Generally speaking, we are in a time of political stability and there is not much difference in policy between the two major parties in Australia, and no radical sweeping changes that will change the nation, like a GSTax or floating the dollar.

So, if you were to ask us the question: Will interest rates be higher or lower if this party wins, the simple truth is interest rates will be the same despite who wins next month’s election.

For more info, read this article 21/07/10

Property values ride the railways

Jul 7

resizd Train Station-1Property values in Sydney suburbs with rail links to the CBD have outstripped those in suburbs without, says new research.

PRDNationwide has discovered that prices in suburbs near railway stations leapt by 12% in 2009 – whereas those in areas without rail links only grew by 8%.

“Population growth continues in Sydney and this has prompted a high demand for places located near public transport facilities as the capacity of roads to cater for the influx of residents, particularly during peak traffic times deteriorates,” said PRDnationwide managing director Jim Midgley.

The research says the median sale price for properties near railway stations increased to $730,000 during 2009. The highest median price was recorded on the North Shore Line Line, with $1,325,500 recorded over the same period.

However, PRDNationwide points out that while growth has been impressive in the short term, both suburbs with and without train stations recorded equal median price growth 3.1% over a five-year period.

Source: Kevni Eddy 6/7/10 www.brokernews.com.au

When is the best time to sell: Autumn or Spring?

Jun 30
Posted by Plan Assist Filed in Latest News

autumnFrom: The Adviser 30/6/10

Spring no longer represents the best time to sell, according to RP Data.

New research from RP Data has found evidence to suggest that a great number of listings does not necessarily convert into a great number of sales.

RP Data’s research analyst Cameron Kusher found that, on a national basis, March is in fact the busiest month for house and unit sales.

Nationally over the last 10 years, March accounted for circa 9.3 per cent of all dwelling transactions.

“Despite the fact that March is the busiest month for sales, the results show that there is minimal fluctuation in sales activity except within December and January when sales volumes fall away considerably,” Mr Kusher said.

“Clearly once everything starts to settle down after year-end festive periods, the attention turns back to the property market resulting in strong sales volumes during March.”

According to Mr Kusher, May is the second busiest month for sales, accounting for almost 9.2 per cent of all transactions.

The results also confirm that spring is only the second busiest season for purchasers with autumn attracting 26.6 per cent of all sales compared to: 25.4 per cent in spring, 25.3 per cent in winter and 22.7 per cent during summer.

Mr Kusher said that although there is a ramping up in listings from August through to November, the increase in listings is not matched in sales activity. The strongest increase in sales activity is recorded between January and March each year at which time listings also ramp up.

Home buyers enjoy cuts to stamp duty

Jun 9
Posted by Plan Assist Filed in Latest News

Source: The Adviser  By: Jessica Darnbrough

In a bid to make buying a house in Sydney that little bit easier, the NSW government has announced that it will no longer charge stamp duty on homes that are “bought off the plan” for less than $600,000.

The change in state policy will cost the NSW government approximately $184 million in lost property taxes.

Stamp duty will be cut by 25 per cent on homes worth up to $600,000 that are bought during construction or at completion, translating into an average saving of $5,623.

The stamp duty changes are expected to be widely welcomed by NSW buyers, as 79.1 per cent of dwellings within the state are sold for under $600,000.

In addition, the government has also introduced other concessions on new home purchases and construction.

NSW Treasurer Eric Roozendaal said the $140 million property construction initiative will save NSW families and investors up $22,490, with first home buyers eligible to receive benefits of up to $29,490.

“This is an Australian-first, signalling the Keneally government’s commitment to boosting the state’s housing construction sector and building for the future of NSW,” Mr Roozendaal said.

NSW building industry body the Urban Taskforce said the government’s latest announcement shows a clear understanding of the need to increase housing supply in NSW.

“This plan is comprehensive – it offers real hope for homebuyers and renters,” Urban Taskforce chief executive officer Aaron Gadiel said.

According to Mr Gadiel, the targeted stamp duty concession is also a welcome message of support to older Australians and will help industry focus on meeting their housing needs.

“When older Australians make the decision to downsize, they will also be freeing up underutilized existing housing stock which can be occupied by younger families,” he said.

New NSW Property Tax

May 14
Posted by Harry Charalambous Filed in Buyer's Agent, Find me a Property, Latest News, Property Investments

TaxBurdenUPDATE: The Minister for Lands, Tony Kelly, confirmed today the new tax would begin on July 1 and had been formulated as a NSW budget measure.

The tax will be levied on the buyer.

TENS of thousands of NSW home buyers a year are set to be hit with a new tax that will cash in on the improving property market and boost state government coffers by an estimated $90 million annually.

Quietly released by the Minister for Lands, Tony Kelly, amid the wash-up of the federal budget, the new land transfer charge will be imposed on the sale of residential and commercial property worth more than $500,000.

The announcement has outraged property groups, which branded it ”just another stamp duty increase”, while the opposition has criticised the timing of its release as ‘’sneaky”.

Under the proposal, the portion of the sale amount between $500,000 and $1 million will attract a tax rate of 0.2 per cent, before the charge rises to 0.25 per cent for the portion of the sale above $1 million.

The median Sydney house price is about $600,000, which would attract a charge of $200, while the tax on a property sold for $1.2 million would be $1500.

According to figures provided by the Department of Lands, almost 30,000 residential and commercial property sales of between $500,000 and $1 million were settled in the past 12 months. More than 10,000 properties sold for more than $1 million in the same period.

Aaron Gadiel, the chief executive of the developer lobby group Urban Taskforce, said the new charge amounted to a 4.5 per cent increase in stamp duty for the top end of the property market.

He estimated that a developer looking to acquire a $10 million development site for new housing would be hit with an extra cost of $23,000.

Mr Gadiel said that it ”flies in the face” of the recommendations of the recently released Henry tax review, which criticised transfer duties.

”The Henry review said they were unfair; they hit some members of the community harder than others and they could cause economic distortions and reduce business activity,” he said.

The acting NSW executive director of the Property Council of Australia, Glen Byers, said that the tax was introduced ”without consultation, without explanation at a time when the investment climate in NSW is fragile”.

It is understood that legislation for the new tax will not be introduced before the next session of Parliament, which begins next month.

The government is not indicating when the tax might begin, but a spokesman for the Treasurer, Eric Roozendaal, said the revenue forecast to be generated by the tax would be included in the state budget on June 8.

The announcement was labelled ‘’sneaky” by the Opposition Leader, Barry O’Farrell, because it was buried in a press release which focused on new security measures for land transfer documents.

Mr Kelly’s release suggested part of the tax would be used to fund the security measures.

A spokesman for Mr Kelly said revenue from the charge would flow to the Department of Lands, not the Office of State Revenue, as was the case with stamp duty.

However Mr O’Farrell said: ”This is another attempt under the cover of a federal budget to get some bad news out from the state budget, well away from polling day in Penrith.”

Figures provided by Mr Kelly’s office suggest that the proposed NSW charge is at the lower end when compared with similar charges imposed by other states.

Based on a sale worth $750,000, the spokesman said only Western Australia charged a lower ”registration charge” of $260, compared with $500 proposed in NSW. In Victoria, the figure is $1350, in Queensland it is $1623 and in South Australia it is $4759.

Article Source:  13/5/10 SEAN NICHOLLS – STATE POLITICAL EDITOR

Easy AdSense by Unreal

Powered by eShop v.3